Bug 1658

Summary:	Review request: openshot - free non linear video editor
Product:	Package Reviews	Reporter:	Patrice Ferlet <metal3d>
Component:	Review Request	Assignee:	RPM Fusion Package Review <rpmfusion-package-review>
Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE
Severity:	normal	CC:	bloch, hans, hobbes1069, rpmfusion-package-review
Priority:	P5
Version:	Current
Hardware:	All
OS:	GNU/Linux
namespace:

Description Patrice Ferlet 2011-03-13 21:09:48 CET

http://www.metal3d.org/rpms/openshot.spec
http://www.metal3d.org/rpms/openshot-1.3.0-1.fc14.src.rpm

Openshot is a free, opensource video editing. Used to create video, effects

My package has no error or warning... but maybe you can help me for one file: /usr/lib/mime/packages/ is not "plateform dependant" but is installed "as it" by openshot setup.py. I don't know why and for wath is made this file... another mime pacakge is installed in python site libs...

rpmlint RPMS/noarch/openshot-1.3.0-1.fc14.noarch.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

I'm seeking a sponsor :)

Comment 1 Patrice Ferlet 2011-03-13 21:22:28 CET

http://www.metal3d.org/rpms/openshot.spec
http://www.metal3d.org/rpms/openshot-1.3.0-2.fc14.src.rpm

I changed CFLAGS (not needed for noarch) and remove comments... sorry

Comment 2 Patrice Ferlet 2011-03-16 16:53:32 CET

http://www.metal3d.org/rpms/openshot.spec
http://www.metal3d.org/rpms/openshot-1.3.0-3.fc14.src.rpm

New changes, melt command is "mlt-melt". Patch made to correct sources

Need help for this error:

$ rpmlint SPECS/openshot.spec RPMS/noarch/openshot-1.3.0-3.fc14.noarch.rpm SRPMS/openshot-1.3.0-3.fc14.src.rpm 
SPECS/openshot.spec:61: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/mime/packages/%{name}
openshot.src:61: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/mime/packages/%{name}
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings.

Comment 3 Adam Huffman 2011-04-02 16:05:16 CEST

Have you seen this existing review request?:

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=993

Comment 4 Hans de Goede 2011-04-04 20:34:32 CEST

Hi,

Thanks for your submission! As already mentioned by Adam we already have a review request open, see bug 993. I'm going to close this one as a duplicate of that. Normally I would invite you to co-maintain openshot with the submitter of bug 993, but since you're not a packager yet, that is sort of hard.

In general we advice people who want to become a packager, to first do so for Fedora itself:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join

One of the main reasons for that is that the Fedora project has a lot more contributors and thus a lot more capacity for coaching people to become packagers.

You can find a list of potential packages to package for Fedora here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList

Regards,

Hans

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 993 ***