Bug 2363

Summary:	jitsi - Open Source Video Calls and Chat
Product:	Package Reviews	Reporter:	Mario Santagiuliana <fedora>
Component:	Review Request	Assignee:	RPM Fusion Package Review <rpmfusion-package-review>
Status:	RESOLVED EXPIRED
Severity:	normal	CC:	rpmfusion-package-review, sergio
Priority:	P5
Version:	Current
Hardware:	All
OS:	GNU/Linux
namespace:	free

Description Mario Santagiuliana 2012-06-05 13:34:42 CEST

SPEC: http://marionline.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/jitsi.spec
SRPMS: http://marionline.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/jitsi-1.1-1.nightly.build.4051.fc16.src.rpm

Description:
Jitsi (previously SIP Communicator) is an audio/video and chat communicator
that supports protocols such as SIP, XMPP/Jabber, AIM/ICQ, Windows Live, Yahoo!
and many other useful features.

Why here:
This package cannot be shipped into official fedora repository because upstream use ffmpeg library.

Rpmlint:
jitsi.src: W: invalid-url Source4: portaudio-hotplug-r1838.tar.gz
jitsi.src: W: invalid-url Source3: jdic-r1736.tar.gz
jitsi.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/portaudio-hotplug-r1838/libportaudio.a
jitsi.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/portaudio-hotplug-r1838/portaudio.h
jitsi.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/portaudio-hotplug-r1838/pkgconfig/portaudio-2.0.pc
jitsi.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/portaudio-hotplug-r1838/pa_linux_alsa.h
jitsi.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary jitsi
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings.

I think jdic and portaudio branch hotplug for now is useful just for jitsi so I include them directly in this package. There are not official releases of this two packages, I checkout the code from svn repository.

This is not my first RPM package. I just open another review request here for another SIP software, homer:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2237

Comment 1 Nicolas Chauvet 2017-09-01 18:06:48 CEST

There is jitsi 2.9 package now
Are you still interested in introducing it in RPMFusion

FYI, please don't let the review hanging around, try to seek a reviewer on the mailing list.

Comment 2 Nicolas Chauvet 2018-02-26 18:36:33 CET

Please answer back to the review if you still want to maintain this here.
You need to find a Fedora/ RPM Fusion packager and if needed, escalate on the mailing list to trade review.