Bug 3103

Summary:	Review request: libbdplus - A research project to implement the BD+ System Specifications
Product:	Package Reviews	Reporter:	Simone Caronni <negativo17>
Component:	Review Request	Assignee:	RPM Fusion Package Review <rpmfusion-package-review>
Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE
Severity:	normal	CC:	rpmfusion-package-review, xavier
Priority:	P5
Version:	Current
Hardware:	All
OS:	GNU/Linux
namespace:

Description Simone Caronni 2014-01-06 10:45:35 CET

SPEC: http://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/libbdplus.spec
SRPM: http://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/libbdplus-0.1.0-1.fc20.src.rpm

libbdplus is a research project to implement the BD+ System Specifications.
This research project provides, through an open-source library, a way to
understand how the BD+ works.

This project doesn't offer any key, configuration file or certificate that could
be used to decode encrypted copyrighted material.

$ rpmlint *rpm
libbdplus-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

This package cannot be included in Fedora as it depends on libaacs which is hosted in RPMFusion repositories.

Comment 1 Simone Caronni 2014-01-06 11:21:08 CET

This is required for the upcoming VLC 2.2 BD+ support. It can be compiled without libaacs support, but without it there's no way to play encrypted discs.

Comment 2 Simone Caronni 2014-01-06 11:22:02 CET

Upstream patch added after 0.1.0 for removing libaacs support:

http://git.videolan.org/?p=libbdplus.git;a=commitdiff;h=bd48e605afd8649cfb2a5e48a6233b7500809d22;hp=4f4dabd4fd70edf0d510bd8bb400b076026ebe43

Comment 3 Xavier Bachelot 2014-01-06 12:04:30 CET

Already submitted : https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3099
And libaacs is already packaged so libbdplus can be built with libaacs support enabled.
I'll diff the specs and see if there's anything that needs to be merged.
If you can do the review and co-maintain with me, that would be awesome.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 3099 ***

Comment 4 Simone Caronni 2014-01-08 08:46:20 CET

(In reply to comment #3)
> I'll diff the specs and see if there's anything that needs to be merged.
> If you can do the review and co-maintain with me, that would be awesome.

Sure, no problem.