| Summary: | xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-340xx-libs.i686 and xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-cuda.i686 packages missing from x86_64 repository | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Infrastructure | Reporter: | Lee Trager <lt73> |
| Component: | Repo | Assignee: | Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | alexpl, leigh123linux, lxtnow, matthias, MeSat, skomra |
| Priority: | P5 | ||
| Version: | NA | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | GNU/Linux | ||
| namespace: | |||
|
Description
Lee Trager
2015-01-13 08:24:36 CET
Thx for warning, this should be fixed once the driver hit stable updates. I am testing this module as well and I found that it won't work for glx. I get the following xerror. grep -i glx Xorg.0.log [ 17119.332] (II) "glx" will be loaded. This was enabled by default and also specified in the config file. [ 17119.332] (II) LoadModule: "glx" [ 17119.332] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so [ 17119.357] (II) Module glx: vendor="X.Org Foundation" [ 17119.357] (==) AIGLX enabled [ 17119.364] (EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to initialize the GLX module; please check in your X [ 17119.364] (EE) NVIDIA(0): log file that the GLX module has been loaded in your X [ 17119.364] (EE) NVIDIA(0): server, and that the module is the NVIDIA GLX module. If [ 17120.200] (II) AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI2 capable [ 17120.200] (EE) AIGLX: reverting to software rendering [ 17120.222] (EE) AIGLX error: dlopen of /usr/lib64/dri/swrast_dri.so failed (/usr/lib64/dri/swrast_dri.so: undefined symbol: _glapi_tls_Dispatch) [ 17120.222] (EE) GLX: could not load software renderer [ 17120.222] (II) GLX: no usable GL providers found for screen 0 Using the 340 driver from nVidia worked but it used it's own version of glx which worked. I have tried the default installation and a custom xorg.conf file with no success. I don't know if you would like me to file a new bug, if yes, do tell. I am also using the 340xx x86_64 packages and I noticed that nvidia-smi was missing. I downloaded the srpm, did a local build and I found that it is included only in xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-340xx-cuda-340.65-4.fc20.x86_64.rpm. Is that intentional? (In reply to comment #3) > I don't know if you would like me to file a new bug, if yes, do tell. > > I am also using the 340xx x86_64 packages and I noticed that nvidia-smi was > missing. I downloaded the srpm, did a local build and I found that it is > included only in xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-340xx-cuda-340.65-4.fc20.x86_64.rpm. Is > that intentional? Yes, it is. Closing the bug as the initial is fixed.(or will be fixed when the next kernel will hit stable updates). |