| Summary: | Retire nonfree/e-uae | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Infrastructure | Reporter: | Andrea Musuruane <musuruan> |
| Component: | Repo | Assignee: | Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | enhancement | CC: | lxtnow, matthias, sergio |
| Priority: | P1 | ||
| Version: | NA | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | GNU/Linux | ||
| namespace: | |||
| Bug Depends on: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 4163 | ||
|
Description
Andrea Musuruane
2017-09-16 14:50:31 CEST
package failed to build on f27+, so it's already blocked. Retired in pkgdb Given that it only remains on GA release repository, there is nothing much to do (it will remains available in stables releases). Please consider to properly Obsoletes/provides e-uae (with a version) (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #1) > Please consider to properly Obsoletes/provides e-uae (with a version) fs-uae is not a drop in replacement for e-uae. So I don't think obsoletes/provides is appropriate. It should be better to remove e-uae from the end user machine. So Obsoletes: should be added to RPM Fusion's fedora-obsolete-packages. But it seems there isn't one: https://lists.rpmfusion.org/archives/list/rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org/thread/PQ2C7USY3RG6XMEGQXOHTHC3JN36JCWE/ (In reply to Andrea Musuruane from comment #2) > (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #1) > > Please consider to properly Obsoletes/provides e-uae (with a version) > > fs-uae is not a drop in replacement for e-uae. So I don't think > obsoletes/provides is appropriate. > > It should be better to remove e-uae from the end user machine. So Obsoletes: > should be added to RPM Fusion's fedora-obsolete-packages. But it seems there > isn't one: > https://lists.rpmfusion.org/archives/list/rpmfusion-developers@lists. > rpmfusion.org/thread/PQ2C7USY3RG6XMEGQXOHTHC3JN36JCWE/ You could make it, but it's also should be possible to have it added to the fedora one. (one should ask). (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #3) > (In reply to Andrea Musuruane from comment #2) > > (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #1) > > > Please consider to properly Obsoletes/provides e-uae (with a version) > > > > fs-uae is not a drop in replacement for e-uae. So I don't think > > obsoletes/provides is appropriate. > > > > It should be better to remove e-uae from the end user machine. So Obsoletes: > > should be added to RPM Fusion's fedora-obsolete-packages. But it seems there > > isn't one: > > https://lists.rpmfusion.org/archives/list/rpmfusion-developers@lists. > > rpmfusion.org/thread/PQ2C7USY3RG6XMEGQXOHTHC3JN36JCWE/ > > You could make it, but it's also should be possible to have it added to the > fedora one. (one should ask). Frankly, I doubt Fedora wants to have something to do with third party repositories. Moreover a package could live in more than one third party repository - therefore obsoleting one in RPM Fusion will obsolete all. I can go with the first option. But I need a bit of time - I need to do other things now. |