| Summary: | Missing i686 rpm for latest kmod-ndiswrapper release | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Fedora | Reporter: | Tony Grant <tony> |
| Component: | ndiswrapper-kmod | Assignee: | Xavier Lamien <lxtnow> |
| Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | fedora, kwizart, splewako |
| Priority: | P5 | ||
| Version: | 10 | ||
| Hardware: | i386 | ||
| OS: | GNU/Linux | ||
| namespace: | |||
|
Description
Tony Grant
2009-04-06 18:02:05 CEST
I'll queue and push a rebuild @Xavier: Do you have any idea why that happens? Seems it started to happen two or three weeks ago in all branches The lastest ndiswrapper release fails to build and need fix before build against it. That could be the matter. Accroding to http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-10-rpmfusion_free/3494-ndiswrapper-kmod-1.53-5.fc10.17/ [+] there's a successful build job that should be do the trick for now. Is still there an issue with this build at this time ? (In reply to comment #2) > The lastest ndiswrapper release fails to build and need fix before build > against it. That could be the matter. We really could need those for rawhide and need them for F10 soon, as that will get 2.6.29 sooner or later > Accroding to > http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-10-rpmfusion_free/3494-ndiswrapper-kmod-1.53-5.fc10.17/ > [+] > there's a successful build job that should be do the trick for now. That the job I referred to in commet #1 when I meant "I'll queue and push a rebuild" > Is still there an issue with this build at this time ? not for ndiswrapper, but the situations itself remains really annoying: seems the buildsys silently ignored either i586 or i686 (In reply to comment #2) > The lastest ndiswrapper release fails to build and need fix before build > against it. That could be the matter. > > Accroding to > http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-10-rpmfusion_free/3494-ndiswrapper-kmod-1.53-5.fc10.17/ > [+] > there's a successful build job that should be do the trick for now. > > Is still there an issue with this build at this time ? > Worked fine. I did a yum update as soon as the package became available and am connected with it now. Release 1.54 has been fixed and built fine now. |