| Summary: | OpenShot 2.4.2 has been released | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Fedora | Reporter: | FeRD (Frank Dana) <ferdnyc> |
| Component: | openshot | Assignee: | Richard <hobbes1069> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | enhancement | CC: | sergio |
| Priority: | P1 | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | GNU/Linux | ||
| namespace: | |||
| Attachments: |
Diff of updates to libopenshot-audio.spec
Diff of updates to libopenshot.spec Diff of updates to openshot.spec ffmpeg 4.0 compatibility patch, used in libopenshot.spec libopenshot-audio source patch, applied in .spec Diff of updates to libopenshot-audio.spec Diff of updates to libopenshot.spec Diff of updates to openshot.spec Diff of updates to openshot.spec Diff of updates to libopenshot.spec |
||
|
Description
FeRD (Frank Dana)
2018-07-07 07:28:53 CEST
Created attachment 1917 [details]
Diff of updates to libopenshot.spec
Created attachment 1918 [details]
Diff of updates to openshot.spec
Created attachment 1919 [details]
ffmpeg 4.0 compatibility patch, used in libopenshot.spec
Created attachment 1920 [details]
libopenshot-audio source patch, applied in .spec
I'm not sure when I'll have time to work on this if one of the other maintainers wants to take it on that would be great. Created attachment 1925 [details]
Diff of updates to libopenshot-audio.spec
Apologies, my previous patches weren't properly formatted, and I mistakenly had the new ruby-libopenshot package obsoleting itself. Attaching a new set of correctly-formatted (git diff) patches for the spec files.
Created attachment 1926 [details]
Diff of updates to libopenshot.spec
Created attachment 1927 [details]
Diff of updates to openshot.spec
Created attachment 1928 [details]
Diff of updates to openshot.spec
Argh, one more time to fix the changelog chronology, or rpmbuild will bail.
Created attachment 1929 [details]
Diff of updates to libopenshot.spec
(In reply to Richard from comment #5) > I'm not sure when I'll have time to work on this if one of the other > maintainers wants to take it on that would be great. FeRD have a fas user on rpmfusion ? are you in packager group ? (In reply to Sérgio Basto from comment #11) > (In reply to Richard from comment #5) > > FeRD have a fas user on rpmfusion ? are you in packager group ? Not at current, though I'd be willing to do whatever would be necessary to make that happen. I do have a FAS account (ferdnyc), but it's not a member of any privileged groups there or here. (In reply to FeRD from comment #12) > (In reply to Sérgio Basto from comment #11) > > (In reply to Richard from comment #5) > > > > FeRD have a fas user on rpmfusion ? are you in packager group ? > > Not at current, though I'd be willing to do whatever would be necessary to > make that happen. > > I do have a FAS account (ferdnyc), but it's not a member of any privileged > groups there or here. and in Fedora are you in packager group ? (In reply to Sérgio Basto from comment #13) > (In reply to FeRD from comment #12) > > (In reply to Sérgio Basto from comment #11) > > > (In reply to Richard from comment #5) > > > > > > FeRD have a fas user on rpmfusion ? are you in packager group ? > > > > Not at current, though I'd be willing to do whatever would be necessary to > > make that happen. > > > > I do have a FAS account (ferdnyc), but it's not a member of any privileged > > groups there or here. > > and in Fedora are you in packager group ? if you are Fedora packager , you are automatically sponsored , if not I can sponsor you , just have to ask for authorization ... OpenShot 2.4.2 built in rawhide with all patches from here . OpenShot 2.4.2 is in F27 and others in updates stable repo . |