| Summary: | require mesa-vulkan-drivers | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Fedora | Reporter: | Kamil Páral <kparal> |
| Component: | steam | Assignee: | Simone Caronni <negativo17> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | enhancement | CC: | leigh123linux |
| Priority: | P1 | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | GNU/Linux | ||
| namespace: | |||
|
Description
Kamil Páral
2018-09-21 16:05:04 CEST
Does steam use system vulkan-loader? I don't know. But it's a requirement of mesa-vulkan-drivers, but it will get always installed. Or what's the reason why you're asking? (In reply to Kamil Páral from comment #2) > I don't know. But it's a requirement of mesa-vulkan-drivers, but it will get > always installed. Or what's the reason why you're asking? I thought it would be better to require vulkan-loader $ rpm -q --requires vulkan-loader |grep mesa mesa-vulkan-drivers(x86-64) There seems to be a cyclic dependency then: $ rpm -q --requires mesa-vulkan-drivers | grep vulkan vulkan(x86-64) vulkan(x86-32) $ rpm -q --whatprovides vulkan vulkan-loader-1.1.82.0-1.fc29.x86_64 vulkan-loader-1.1.82.0-1.fc29.i686 But I agree, including vulkan-loader as a dependency is safer than not including it. The above dependency cycle can change in the future. Is there something I can do to move this forward? A pull request is here: https://github.com/rpmfusion/steam/pull/6 Applied & building, also for F27/28. Thanks. |