| Summary: | Review Request: intel-media-driver - The Intel Media Driver for VAAPI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Package Reviews | Reporter: | Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart> |
| Component: | Review Request | Assignee: | Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | enhancement | CC: | rpmfusion-package-review, zebob.m |
| Priority: | P1 | Flags: | zebob.m:
fedora-review+
|
| Version: | Current | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | GNU/Linux | ||
| namespace: | nonfree | ||
| Bug Depends on: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 4 | ||
|
Description
Nicolas Chauvet
2018-10-08 22:14:20 CEST
/usr/share/appdata is deprecated, install the metainfo file in %{_metainfodir}
Build error: -- Checking for module 'pciaccess' -- Package 'pciaccess', required by 'virtual:world', not found BUILDSTDERR: CMake Error at /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindPkgConfig.cmake:436 (message): BUILDSTDERR: A required package was not found BUILDSTDERR: Call Stack (most recent call first): BUILDSTDERR: /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindPkgConfig.cmake:602 (_pkg_check_modules_internal) BUILDSTDERR: media_driver/media_top_cmake.cmake:90 (pkg_check_modules) BUILDSTDERR: media_driver/CMakeLists.txt:89 (include) -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred! After adding: BuildRequires: pkgconfig(pciaccess) New error: UILDSTDERR: /builddir/build/BUILD/media-driver-intel-media-18.3.0/media_driver/linux/common/codec/ddi/media_libva_decoder.cpp:45:10: fatal error: X11/Xutil.h: No such file or directory BUILDSTDERR: #include <X11/Xutil.h> BUILDSTDERR: ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ BUILDSTDERR: compilation terminated.
- So for this to actually build you need to add:
BuildRequires: pkgconfig(pciaccess)
BuildRequires: pkgconfig(x11)
Package Review
==============
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
===== MUST items =====
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Expat License BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License", "BSD
3-clause "New" or "Revised" License", "Expat License", "Unknown or
generated". 184 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/intel-media-driver/review-
intel-media-driver/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: No %config files under /usr.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in intel-
media-driver-debuginfo , intel-media-driver-debugsource
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
is arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: intel-media-driver-18.3.0-1.fc30.x86_64.rpm
intel-media-driver-debuginfo-18.3.0-1.fc30.x86_64.rpm
intel-media-driver-debugsource-18.3.0-1.fc30.x86_64.rpm
intel-media-driver-18.3.0-1.fc30.src.rpm
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
(In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #0) > This is for the nonfree section because of some blob in hex forms If you have a minute, could you point me to them (just to satisfy my curiosity)? I checked out upstream and could spot only one thing (guess I missed something you found) when running """ find . -type f -not -regex '\./\.git/.*' -print0 | xargs -0 file | grep -v -e 'C source' -e 'C++ source' -e '.asm:' -e '.cmake:' -e '.py:' -e '.sh:' """: ./Tools/MediaDriverTools/UMDPerfProfiler/MediaPerfParser: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2, for GNU/Linux 3.2.0, BuildID[sha1]=f7472f338af769ba09420452ad9ad0a3b13c9aee, with debug_info, not stripped But I wonder if that file is actually needed or if it's simply a mistake that it got included. (In reply to Thorsten Leemhuis from comment #5) > (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #0) > > > This is for the nonfree section because of some blob in hex forms > > If you have a minute, could you point me to them (just to satisfy my > curiosity)? I checked out upstream and could spot only one thing (guess I > missed something you found) when running """ find . -type f -not -regex > '\./\.git/.*' -print0 | xargs -0 file | grep -v -e 'C source' -e 'C++ > source' -e '.asm:' -e '.cmake:' -e '.py:' -e '.sh:' """: That kind of thing is not really in a format "suitable for edition". https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/media-driver/master/media_driver/agnostic/gen11/codec/kernel/igcodeckrn_g11.c This file seems to be generated from a binary in the Tools directory, but there is nowhere a version of the original file. There is a mention that a FLOSS version could eventually be built. https://github.com/intel/media-driver/blob/master/distro_cmake.sh Now I'm not sure how usable it would be ? That been said, I also miss the needed hardware at hand so I'm seeking for a more interested maintainer once reviewed. (and eventually have an intel-media-driver-free in fedora if relevant). > ./Tools/MediaDriverTools/UMDPerfProfiler/MediaPerfParser: > ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, > interpreter /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2, for GNU/Linux 3.2.0, > BuildID[sha1]=f7472f338af769ba09420452ad9ad0a3b13c9aee, with debug_info, not > stripped > > But I wonder if that file is actually needed or if it's simply a mistake > that it got included. Good catch, it's not used at build time, but there is no source for the file. Others tools seems to be available for building, but it seems more debugging tools for intel-media-driver devs. Spec URL: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/intel-media-driver.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/intel-media-driver-18.3.0-2.fc28.src.rpm Description: The Intel Media Driver for VAAPI Changelog: - Use metainfodir - Enable AppStream support (no hardware detection yet) - Add missing BR - Remove pre-built tools Looks good to me. Package approved. Thx imported. |