| Summary: | Tracker: Packages that could be moved to Fedora | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Fedora | Reporter: | Xavier Bachelot <xavier> |
| Component: | 00_default | Assignee: | RPM Fusion system account <noreply> |
| Status: | NEW --- | ||
| Severity: | enhancement | CC: | dominik, leigh123linux, ngompa13 |
| Priority: | P1 | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | GNU/Linux | ||
| namespace: | |||
| Bug Depends on: | 6255, 6256, 6257, 6258, 6839, 6888, 6890, 6912, 6913, 6278, 6280, 6960 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
Xavier Bachelot
2019-04-14 12:35:36 CEST
I don't feel to handle the assigne here. Anyone to pick this ? Maybe it would be worthwhile filing a RFE against fedora gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free package and request they package libmpeg2 have the most to gain from this change. (In reply to leigh scott from comment #2) > Maybe it would be worthwhile filing a RFE against fedora > gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free package and request they package libmpeg2 have > the most to gain from this change. ^^ They have the most to gain from this change. Based on what Neal said in #rpmfusion today, the following are eligible starting now: xvidcore libdca These also can move: vcdimager libmpeg3 live555 |