| Summary: | Unable to share screen in Google Meet (works with Chromium from Fedora) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Fedora | Reporter: | Marcin Zajaczkowski <mszpak> |
| Component: | chromium-freeworld | Assignee: | qvint <dotqvint> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | enhancement | CC: | ab, dotqvint, jan |
| Priority: | P1 | ||
| Version: | f32 | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | GNU/Linux | ||
| namespace: | |||
|
Description
Marcin Zajaczkowski
2020-09-16 22:17:51 CEST
chromium-common-85.0.4183.83-1.fc32.x86_64 → chromium-freeworld-85.0.4183.83-2.fc32 Looking for possible solutions for bug 5743, I've noticed that the original Fedora rpm spec has an option to be build as a freeworld variant: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/chromium/blob/master/f/chromium.spec#_41 There is a chance that Google Meet doesn't work with chromium-freeworld due to one of ~100 patches missing. I know that chromium-freeworld is a continuation of problematic in maintain freeworld-libs for Chromium, but I don't know the outset of this package. As a result, I don't know what is a reason of not sharing the same spec file (or very similar with just some extra patches) to the Fedora upstream version (to make the maintenance easier)? (In reply to Marcin Zajaczkowski from comment #2) > There is a chance that Google Meet doesn't work with chromium-freeworld due to one of ~100 patches missing. I suspect it's just because freeworld has "enable_hangout_services_extension" set to false. > I suspect it's just because freeworld has "enable_hangout_services_extension" set to false. After reading that Debian thread I had a similar suspicions: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=886358 I wonder, if it was done on purpose (to keep it disabled) or it was just a change applied in the official Fedora package later on which wasn't backported? (In reply to Marcin Zajaczkowski from comment #4) > I wonder, if it was done on purpose (to keep it disabled) or it was just a > change applied in the official Fedora package later on which wasn't > backported? No need to wonder, GIT is your friend. Fedora has it true from the beginning https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/chromium/c/0df9641b97490bb416253df0f618ab620248a10a while rpmfusion has it false from the beginning: https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/free/chromium-freeworld.git/commit/?id=13ea22cdb3bf37484836e362fca4d796a8287be6 > No need to wonder, GIT is your friend. Fedora has it true from the beginning
> while rpmfusion has it false from the beginning:
Thanks :). That answers one part of the question. The second, if it was done intentionally (e.g. to protect the RPM Fusion users privacy) or not remains open.
*** Bug 5766 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Fixed in 85.0.4183.121-1 |