| Summary: | [PATCH] Add `Supplements: yt-dlp` to ffmpeg. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Fedora | Reporter: | Maxwell G <gotmax> |
| Component: | ffmpeg | Assignee: | Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik> |
| Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | ||
| Severity: | enhancement | CC: | belegdol, kwizart, leigh123linux |
| Priority: | P1 | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | GNU/Linux | ||
| namespace: | |||
| Attachments: | [PATCH] Add `Supplements: yt-dlp` to ffmpeg. | ||
|
Description
Maxwell G
2022-02-11 23:07:18 CET
I understand that it's how the "fedora project" wants to turn us into "slavery" by solving their packaging problem, and maintaining a tremendous list of packages that can be supplemented by ffmpeg, but we (ffmpeg active maintainers) do not consent to that. The concern is that it create an incentive for every projects optionality using ffmpeg binaries to submit a similar bug. We we well end in a many to 1 ratio instead of having 1 to 1 ratio where maintainer just add Recommends: /usr/bin/ffmpeg even for the fedora cases. Instead I recommend to use pkcon in your application to install the appropriate binaries at runtime. See PackageKit. Also beware that fedora now provide a particularly disabled ffmpeg, so you will have to test codec availability if any users end with such package. File it against fedora ffmpeg. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=35247 |