| Summary: | Backport a patch for the upcoming mesa 24.1.4 to fix corrupted AV1 decoding with radeonsi | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Fedora | Reporter: | misc.widely812 |
| Component: | mesa-freeworld | Assignee: | Luya Tshimbalanga <luya_tfz> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | enhancement | CC: | fedora, leigh123linux, slartibart70 |
| Priority: | P1 | ||
| Version: | f40 | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | GNU/Linux | ||
| namespace: | |||
| Attachments: |
Proposed patch
AV1 HW Decoding broken on mesa-freeworld 24.1.4-1 |
||
|
Description
misc.widely812
2024-07-19 10:32:47 CEST
Created attachment 2571 [details]
Proposed patch
Created attachment 2572 [details]
AV1 HW Decoding broken on mesa-freeworld 24.1.4-1
Can confirm it's broken on -1. Upgrading to -2 fixes it. I will mark this as thread as fixed since that version is gonna be pushed to repos very soon.
(In reply to misc.widely812 from comment #2) > Created attachment 2572 [details] > AV1 HW Decoding broken on mesa-freeworld 24.1.4-1 > > Can confirm it's broken on -1. Upgrading to -2 fixes it. I will mark this as > thread as fixed since that version is gonna be pushed to repos very soon. It will be pushed next Friday as the fixed package missed the last push. just out of curiosity: there is also a fix for ffmpeg (6.1.1-19) on fedora40 https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/29400#note_2432971 and https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-810afc5c2e which lands in ffmpeg-free (fedora) and libav* files. Isn't there a need to update rpmfusions ffmpeg repos as well? current repo availability: ffmpeg.x86_64 6.1.1-14.fc40 @rpmfusion-free-updates (In reply to leigh scott from comment #3) > It will be pushed next Friday as the fixed package missed the last push. Leigh, I'm sure you had your reason to untagged that -2 build and revert the change in the vcs for f41 and f40, but still would have been nice if you had shared your line of thought. Was it https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-810afc5c2e ? I guess that might have been right at the time. Whatever. But it seems Fedora is now doing what the reporter of this ticket suggested -- at least for f41: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mesa/c/bd66117503acfb8a1e8cc7961f1e8185805a3c0b?branch=rawhide Should we follow suite? [CCing leigh to make sure this comment is noticed] (In reply to Thorsten Leemhuis from comment #5) > (In reply to leigh scott from comment #3) > > > It will be pushed next Friday as the fixed package missed the last push. > > Leigh, I'm sure you had your reason to untagged that -2 build and revert the > change in the vcs for f41 and f40, but still would have been nice if you had > shared your line of thought. > > Was it https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-810afc5c2e ? I > guess that might have been right at the time. Whatever. But it seems Fedora > is now doing what the reporter of this ticket suggested -- at least for f41: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mesa/c/ > bd66117503acfb8a1e8cc7961f1e8185805a3c0b?branch=rawhide > > Should we follow suite? |