Bug 4493 (ppc) - Tracker for ppc-FTBFS
Summary: Tracker for ppc-FTBFS
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: ppc
Product: Infrastructure
Classification: Unclassified
Component: General (show other bugs)
Version: NA
Hardware: x86_64 GNU/Linux
: P1 enhancement
Assignee: Nicolas Chauvet
URL:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2017-03-28 18:57 CEST by Nicolas Chauvet
Modified: 2023-01-06 10:51 CET (History)
7 users (show)

See Also:
namespace:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Nicolas Chauvet 2017-03-28 18:57:46 CEST
This is the tracker for packages that either :
- Should build on PowerPC and need to be fixed.
- Have set ExcludeArch/ExclusiveArch as a workaround.
Comment 1 leigh scott 2017-03-29 11:21:44 CEST
These are the ones I remember doing

dhewm3 - Add ExcludeArch for ppc64le due to missing ppc_intrinsics.h

aegisub - exclude ppc and aarch64 as the bundled luajit fails to build
Comment 2 leigh scott 2017-03-30 11:59:01 CEST
I also added ExclusiveArch to avidemux

https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/free/avidemux.git/commit/
Comment 3 Xavier Bachelot 2017-03-30 12:05:52 CEST
Adding frogatto to the list, it failed to build because of its size (around 500MB).
Comment 4 Xavier Bachelot 2017-04-04 10:43:53 CEST
lightspark - build fail on ppc64 and ppc64le, added 'ExcludeArch: ppc64 ppc64le' and filed a bug upstream.
Comment 5 Vasiliy Glazov 2017-04-17 12:51:25 CEST
simplescreenrecorder - added ExcludeArch: %{power64}

Upstream not response https://github.com/MaartenBaert/ssr/issues/533
Comment 6 trung.le 2020-09-21 16:24:00 CEST
I do not think this is relevant anymore. I could successfull build SSR 0.4.2 on Fedora 33 PPC64LE.

Please revert the arch exclusion patch
Comment 7 Nicolas Chauvet 2020-09-21 17:38:38 CEST
(In reply to trung.le from comment #6)
> I do not think this is relevant anymore. I could successfull build SSR 0.4.2
> on Fedora 33 PPC64LE.
No, it's still broken on ppc64le (on f34 at least)
http://koji.rpmfusion.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/8353/438353/build.log
Comment 8 trung.le 2020-09-27 10:02:23 CEST
Please see the status of ticket https://github.com/MaartenBaert/ssr/issues/533

It should be marked as resolved now
Comment 9 Jeffkonaa 2021-10-28 20:54:19 CEST
It does not happen on every run. My MWE:
``` http://www-look-4.com/tech/honor-magicbook/
// test.cpp
#include<iostream>

int main() https://komiya-dental.com/property/google-android/
{
    int a{ 4 };

    std::cout << "a = " << a << '\n';
http://www.iu-bloomington.com/property/properties-in-turkey/
    return 0;
}
```
Simply running the program under GDB yields:
``` https://waytowhatsnext.com/property/disney-at-home/
(gdb) r
Starting program: test-gdb/a.out
[New Thread 0x1a03 of process 24826]
[New Thread 0x1b03 of process 24826] http://www.wearelondonmade.com/technology/van-technology/
warning: unhandled dyld version (17)
a = 4
[Inferior 1 (process 24826) exited normally]
``` http://www.jopspeech.com/technology/thunderbolt-4/
However, setting breakpoints triggers it:
```
(gdb) b main http://joerg.li/technology/b-class-cars/
Breakpoint 1 at 0x100003e57: file test.cpp, line 5.
(gdb) r
Starting program: test-gdb/a.out
[New Thread 0x2403 of process 24836] http://connstr.net/technology/nasa-latest/
[New Thread 0x2203 of process 24836]
warning: unhandled dyld version (17)
http://embermanchester.uk/tech/google-drive/
Thread 2 hit Breakpoint 1, main () at test.cpp:5
5	    int a{ 4 };
(gdb) r http://www.slipstone.co.uk/technology/cars-interior/
The program being debugged has been started already.
Start it from the beginning? (y or n) n
Program not restarted. http://www.logoarts.co.uk/technology/robot-vacuums/
(gdb) q
A debugging session is active.

	Inferior 1 [process 24836] will be killed. http://www.acpirateradio.co.uk/technology/global-warming/

Quit anyway? (y or n) y
../../gdb/target.c:2149: internal-error: void target_mourn_inferior(ptid_t): Assertion `ptid == inferior_ptid' failed. http://www.compilatori.com/technology/download-videos/
A problem internal to GDB has been detected,
further debugging may prove unreliable. https://www.webb-dev.co.uk/services/vaccine-services/
Quit this debugging session? (y or n) y
Comment 10 Nicolas Chauvet 2023-01-06 10:51:40 CET
Closing unused tracker.